[37323] in SIPB bug reports
Re: th is completely useless
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Hawkinson)
Mon Aug 9 14:27:36 2010
From jhawk@MIT.EDU Mon Aug 09 18:27:36 2010
Return-Path: <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
Delivered-To: bug-sipb-mtg@CHARON.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 1929 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2010 18:27:36 -0000
Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (18.7.62.36)
by charon.mit.edu with SMTP; 9 Aug 2010 18:27:36 -0000
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103])
by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id o79IRZtt004402;
Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:27:35 -0400
Received: from multics.mit.edu (MULTICS.MIT.EDU [18.187.1.73])
(authenticated bits=56)
(User authenticated as jhawk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id o79IRVlU026883
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from jhawk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308)
id o79IRUbV001335; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:27:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:27:29 -0400
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
To: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Jacob Morzinski <jmorzins@MIT.EDU>, "bug-sipb@MIT.EDU" <bug-sipb@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: th is completely useless
Message-ID: <20100809182729.GO17326@multics.mit.edu>
References: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1008090139470.32552@dr-wily.mit.edu> <20100809135647.GA17326@multics.mit.edu> <C0AE216D81AD0C40BFB86028AC7BCBE101EE61CF2E@EXPO6.exchange.mit.edu> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1008091315460.10567@dr-wily.mit.edu> <20100809181216.GM17326@multics.mit.edu> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1008091412540.28982@dr-wily.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1008091412540.28982@dr-wily.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+jhawk (2007-11-01)
Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@MIT.EDU> wrote on Mon, 9 Aug 2010
at 14:13:36 -0400 in <alpine.DEB.1.10.1008091412540.28982@dr-wily.mit.edu>:
>> My inclination is to point out that it actually works on Solaris-Athena
>> and if anyone cared about Linux they would have complained earlier.
>
> Wait, so you're not going to accept my bug report because I didn't report
> it earlier? I would be offended if I understood the logic here.
No. I was not speaking of accepting your bug report.
You proposed we break a working platform in favor of the platform
you were using. I take a very dim view of that.
(in point of fact it's not necessary to break anything, but...)
--jhawk
