[25078] in SIPB bug reports
Re: Newer mutt, please?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brad Thompson)
Thu Jan 26 14:52:17 2006
From yak@MIT.EDU Thu Jan 26 19:52:16 2006
Return-Path: <yak@MIT.EDU>
Delivered-To: bug-sipb-mtg@CHARON.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 29117 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2006 19:52:16 -0000
Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (18.7.7.80)
by charon.mit.edu with SMTP; 26 Jan 2006 19:52:16 -0000
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103])
by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id k0QJqBx6025482;
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:52:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from multics.mit.edu (MULTICS.MIT.EDU [18.187.1.73])
(authenticated bits=56)
(User authenticated as yak@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.1/8.12.4) with ESMTP id k0QJq84f029478
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:52:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from yak@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9)
id k0QJq8e9009956; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:52:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:52:08 -0500
From: Brad Thompson <yak@MIT.EDU>
To: Vadim Gutnik <gutnik@MIT.EDU>
Cc: bug-sipb@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Newer mutt, please?
Message-ID: <20060126195207.GA9222@multics.mit.edu>
References: <20060126183333.GA3196@multics.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060126183333.GA3196@multics.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Spam-Score: 1.217
X-Spam-Level: * (1.217)
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:33:35PM -0500, Vadim Gutnik wrote:
> Mutt on multics.mit.edu (athena 9.3.18) is version 1.5.6. Is there a way to
> build 1.5.9 (or 1.5.10 for that matter) instead?
1.5.9 is installed for Athena 9.4; I won't be upgrading mutt for
earlier releases. Multics should probably be upgraded.
> Also, I notice that if I set this:
>
> set folder = imaps://gutnik@po10.mit.edu/INBOX/ # All of my folders start here.
>
> mutt doesn't find my folders. This works without SSL. Any idea why?
It works for me on 1.5.9. I can't test it on 1.5.6 without running
into the krb4-hates-SSL bug (which is in every version).
yak
