[24945] in SIPB bug reports
No subject found in mail header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jacob Morzinski)
Tue Sep 20 14:35:36 2005
From jmorzins@MIT.EDU Tue Sep 20 18:35:35 2005
Return-Path: <jmorzins@MIT.EDU>
Delivered-To: bug-sipb-mtg@CHARON.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 5081 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2005 18:35:35 -0000
Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (18.7.7.80)
by charon.mit.edu with SMTP; 20 Sep 2005 18:35:35 -0000
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103])
by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j8KIZSBA013884;
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:35:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kamp-krusty.mit.edu (KAMP-KRUSTY.MIT.EDU [18.152.0.132])
(authenticated bits=56)
(User authenticated as jmorzins@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.1/8.12.4) with ESMTP id j8KIZP1H004683
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:35:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from jmorzins@localhost) by kamp-krusty.mit.edu (8.12.9)
id j8KIZO48010062; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:35:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200509201835.j8KIZO48010062@kamp-krusty.mit.edu>
From: Jacob Morzinski <bug-sipb@MIT.EDU>
To: Jingfeng Wang <jfwang@MIT.EDU>
cc: bug-sipb@MIT.EDU
References: <200509201331.j8KDVDMp013601@amur.mit.edu> <200509201549.j8KFnY30008175@kamp-krusty.mit.edu> <20050920115657.40lht9of6nbk8so0@webmail.mit.edu> <200509201620.j8KGK1qG009135@kamp-krusty.mit.edu> <20050920125652.6jq01ec7dq1w00go@webmail.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Message from Jingfeng Wang <jfwang@MIT.EDU>
of "Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:56:52 EDT." <20050920125652.6jq01ec7dq1w00go@webmail.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.82; nmh 1.0; GNU Emacs 21.4.1
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:35:23 -0400
Sender: jmorzins@MIT.EDU
X-Spam-Score: 2.267
X-Spam-Level: ** (2.267)
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
Hi,
Can we get more details about what the problem is.
When "exmh fails", what happens? If there are any error
messages, can you please cite the entire and complete error
message to us?
If it fails on certain messages, are there any distinguishing
characteristics about those messages that might give a clue about
why it is failing? Do they have attachments, or odd fonts, or
other strange features?
Thanks,
Jacob Morzinski jmorzins@mit.edu
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Jingfeng Wang <jfwang@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> By the way, xmh is functioning.
