[15190] in SIPB bug reports

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: typo in fortune

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jered Floyd)
Tue Aug 10 10:39:46 2004

From jered@convivian.com Tue Aug 10 14:39:46 2004
Return-Path: <jered@convivian.com>
Delivered-To: bug-sipb-mtg@CHARON.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 1228 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2004 14:39:46 -0000
Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (18.7.21.83)
  by charon.mit.edu with SMTP; 10 Aug 2004 14:39:46 -0000
Received: from noisybox.convivian.com (noisybox.convivian.com [64.95.77.250])
	by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id i7AEcigC006246;
	Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:38:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from questionably-configured.permabit.com.convivian.com (gw.permabit.com [67.107.99.99])
	by noisybox.convivian.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1BA8A684092; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:38:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: Chaim Kutnicki <chaim@MIT.EDU>
Cc: bug-sipb@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: typo in fortune
References: <Pine.GSO.4.55L.0406290618160.2409@scrubbing-bubbles.mit.edu>
	<Pine.GSO.4.55L.0406290859120.13208@multics.mit.edu>
	<Pine.GSO.4.55L.0407071724570.19832@buzzword-bingo.mit.edu>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58L.0407072322010.27677@bart-savagewood.mit.edu>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58L.0408050428170.19701@mint-square.mit.edu>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58L.0408090918550.20270@mint-square.mit.edu>
From: Jered Floyd <jered@convivian.com>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 10:38:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58L.0408090918550.20270@mint-square.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <873c2v3vo5.fsf@questionably-configured.permabit.com>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Chaim Kutnicki <chaim@MIT.EDU> writes:

> "Care to expound, or are you just going to leave us all with the
>  impression that you're merely an inarticulate asshole?"
> -- Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard (jay@splut.conmicro.com)
> 
> "Lest I leave the wrong impression, I'm not inarticulate."
> -- Walker Mangum (walker@ficc.uu.net)
> 
> two quotes combined

This looks intentional.  The latter is clearly a follow-up to the
former.

--Jered


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post