[10310] in SIPB bug reports
Re: exmh upgrade
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Hawkinson)
Thu Feb 19 14:51:53 2004
From jhawk@MIT.EDU Thu Feb 19 19:51:53 2004
Return-Path: <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
Delivered-To: bug-sipb-mtg@CHARON.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 5670 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2004 19:51:53 -0000
Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (18.7.7.80)
by charon.mit.edu with SMTP; 19 Feb 2004 19:51:53 -0000
Received: from manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (MANAWATU-MAIL-CENTRE.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.71])
by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id i1JJpNku010124;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:51:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from multics.mit.edu (MULTICS.MIT.EDU [18.187.1.73])
(authenticated bits=56)
(User authenticated as jhawk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
by manawatu-mail-centre.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i1JJpM8e001603;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:51:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from jhawk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9)
id i1JJpLSq024445; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:51:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:51:21 -0500
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
To: Rocco J Pigneri <rpigneri@MIT.EDU>
Cc: bug-sipb@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: exmh upgrade
Message-ID: <20040219195121.GO9390@multics.mit.edu>
References: <200402090420.i194KR9i019159@mass-toolpike.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200402090420.i194KR9i019159@mass-toolpike.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
Rocco J Pigneri <rpigneri@MIT.EDU> wrote on Sun, 8 Feb 2004
at 23:20:27 -0500 in <200402090420.i194KR9i019159@mass-toolpike.mit.edu>:
> I am an exhm user, and I really enjoy using this piece of software.
> Exmh makes my life easier by providing a graphical face to nmh, my
> preferred mail handler. In all, I really enjoy using exmh.
I'm curious -- why do you find exmh superior to evolution, mutt, and pine?
--jhawk
