[5902] in APO Printshop

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Non-profit rules and the current discussion (long)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kristin Kuhn)
Sat Jan 9 03:36:32 2010

In-Reply-To: <311409b1001061958o386a66e9y53ba48e386a50bb5@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kristin Kuhn <kkuhn@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 03:36:10 -0500
To: Sophie <sophical@mit.edu>
Cc: "Leonard H Tower Jr." <tower@alum.mit.edu>, Ellen Kranzer <ccrazy@mit.edu>,
        apo-printshop@mit.edu

--0016368e26de68029b047cb73394
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yes, I'd definitely like to listen to an explanation of the Rules As They
Were. Maybe I knew them once, but in any case I don't know them now... I'm
sure there's plenty of wisdom in them.

-Kristin

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Sophie <sophical@mit.edu> wrote:

> Thanks very much for the work put into this explanation!
>
> The only thing I want to respond to is:
>
> i would like to see the press shop, and the chapter go back to the
>> policies we had up to 5 to 15 years ago (in place since @ least the
>> early '60s, on what use of chapter (i.e. MIT) equipment and resources
>> is allowed, and what isn't.
>> policies that respected the law and MIT policies and procedures
>>
>> perhaps once this is understood and agreed upon,
>> the actives could choose to make it a standing policy
>>
>> it will be some days (hopefully not weeks) until i can really go into
>> this more
>>
>
> If there's policy to be made or clarified by the active brothers, a good
> way to do this might be for those who understand the relevant rules (when
> you schedules allow, of course) to explain the issue to {rulescomm and
> interested printshop people} or {exec and interested printshop people}.  As
> evidenced by having an active (well, it was active last spring) rulescomm
> and upcoming bylaws amendments, I think there is interest among actives in
> maintaining correct policy.  Any standing policy will of course then have to
> run by exec, who will explain it to the chapter as a whole before a vote is
> taken.
>

--0016368e26de68029b047cb73394
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes, I&#39;d definitely like to listen to an explanation of the Rules As Th=
ey Were. Maybe I knew them once, but in any case I don&#39;t know them now.=
.. I&#39;m sure there&#39;s plenty of wisdom in them.<br><br>-Kristin<br>

<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Sophie <span=
 dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:sophical@mit.edu">sophical@mit.edu</a>&g=
t;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left:=
 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex=
;">

Thanks very much for the work put into this explanation!<br><br>The only th=
ing I want to respond to is:<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=
=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid r=
gb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">



i would like to see the press shop, and the chapter go back to the<br>
policies we had up to 5 to 15 years ago (in place since @ least the<br>
early &#39;60s, on what use of chapter (i.e. MIT) equipment and resources<b=
r>
is allowed, and what isn&#39;t.<br>
policies that respected the law and MIT policies and procedures<br>
<br>
perhaps once this is understood and agreed upon,<br>
the actives could choose to make it a standing policy<br>
<br>
it will be some days (hopefully not weeks) until i can really go into<br>
this more<br></blockquote></div><div><br>If there&#39;s policy to be made o=
r clarified by the active brothers, a good way to do this might be for thos=
e who understand the relevant rules (when you schedules allow, of course) t=
o explain the issue to {rulescomm and interested printshop people} or {exec=
 and interested printshop people}.=A0 As evidenced by having an active (wel=
l, it was active last spring) rulescomm and upcoming bylaws amendments, I t=
hink there is interest among actives in maintaining correct policy.=A0 Any =
standing policy will of course then have to run by exec, who will explain i=
t to the chapter as a whole before a vote is taken.<br>


</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>

--0016368e26de68029b047cb73394--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post