[7447] in www-talk@info.cern.ch

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: GIF vs JPEG

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Darren New)
Tue Jan 31 09:08:15 1995

Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 14:23:33 +0100
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: dnew@sgf.fv.com
From: Darren New <dnew@sgf.fv.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>

>   If you'll so a little more research on the JPEG format, you'll find out 
> that it is just a compressed GIF.  So, the main reason why most people 

Ummm, huh?  JPEG and GIF have nothing to do with each other at that 
level. The reason many still use GIF is probably threefold:

1) GIF works better for lineart and other things of limited colors and 
sharp edges. JPEG works better for photographs with lots of colors and 
smooth gradients.

2) GIF is older, which means there's more GIF software than JPEG software.

3) JPEG gives better quality images upon decompression in terms of number 
of colors. Since many graphics displays don't support as many colors as 
JPEG provides, decompression has to go thru a color-selection step too, 
which can be slow. 

    --Darren



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post