[7440] in www-talk@info.cern.ch

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: GIF vs JPEG

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Foster)
Mon Jan 30 18:17:52 1995

Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 23:35:10 +0100
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: mwf@engr.engr.uark.edu
From: Matt Foster <mwf@engr.engr.uark.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>

On Mon, 30 Jan 1995, Steve Knipping wrote:

> 
> We all know that there are far more GIFs on the web than JPEG.  If JPEG 
> files are smaller, why wouldn't we want to use them.   What browsers don't 
>  support JPEG?

  If you'll so a little more research on the JPEG format, you'll find out 
that it is just a compressed GIF.  So, the main reason why most people 
don't use JPEGs in their Web pages is due to the time it takes to 
overhead in loading the JPEG file.  To some, especially me, it just isn't 
worth it.

matt();
http://www.engr.uark.edu/~mwf/


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post