[6752] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: Interlaced vs. Non-interlaced GIFs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Lewis)
Mon Nov 21 20:53:30 1994
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 02:27:44 +0100
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: jlewis@qrc.com
From: jlewis@qrc.com (John Lewis)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
At 09:29 PM 11/21/94 +0100, Chris Lilley, Computer Graphics Unit wrote:
>Bill O'Donnell said:
>
>> David Koblas said:
>
>>> when I rasterize line drawings is the following process:
>>> Frame -> postscript @ 150 dpi -> scale 50% -> GIF
>>> This results in an nice anti-aliased image.
>
>Yes. I wish more people would do this.
Perhaps someone could go into this in a little more detail? I have
photoshop (Mac) at my disposal, as well as a UNIX box (that I am more
unfamilier with)
What do you mean by "Frame"? Do you mean save it (the random image) as a
postscript file at 150dpi, then scale that image by 50% and save as a gif?
What are the advantages to this?
Thanks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Lewis | Space Activism home page
Quantum Research Corporation | http://muon.qrc.com/space/start.html
jlewis@qrc.com |
(301) 657-3070 | [Speaking for myself only]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
