[6558] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
RE: Win95 vs NT (was: RE: revised proposal for file upload...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vladimir Sukonnik, Process Softwar)
Thu Nov 3 15:31:30 1994
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 1994 21:29:54 +0100
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: sukonnik@elnath.process.com
From: sukonnik@elnath.process.com (Vladimir Sukonnik, Process Software Corp)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
--- Begin Included Message ---
>From POP3-Server@elnath.process.com Thu Nov 3 14:27:20 1994
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 94 14:22:59
From: <rdenny@netcom.com>
Subject: Win95 vs NT (was: RE: revised proposal for file upload...)
To: multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Cc:
X-VMS-From: SMTP%"rdenny@netcom.com"
X-POP3-Server: elnath.process.com IUPOP3 V1.8-1/UCX
X-POP3-ID: 1994-11-03.14:31:20.444
Content-Length: 2667
Status:
Received: from www0.cern.ch [128.141.201.214] by elnath.process.com
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Thu, 3 Nov 1994 14:22 -0500
Read Jon Udell article in November 1994 BYTE magazine titled
Exploring Chicago and Daytona. You may reconsider your view
on Win95 as "... a rock-hard goal of running on a 4MB 386".
At this point Win95 is still a moving target for developing on.
In general, I think that the more platforms you support with
your server the better the average joe/jane can participate in the
networked society (and your bank account will reflect that too -).
Best regards,
Vladimir.
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Vladimir Sukonnik Voice: 1-508-879-6994 |
| Principal Software Engineer http://www.process.com |
| Process Software Corp Fax: 1-508-879-0042 |
| 959 Concord Street E-mail: sukonnik@process.com or |
| Framingham, MA 01760 USA sukonnik@bumetb.bu.edu |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
