| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 1994 13:13:15 +0100 Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch Reply-To: FisherM@is3.indy.tce.com From: Fisher Mark <FisherM@is3.indy.tce.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch> Larry Masinter writes in <94Oct15.171137pdt.2760@golden.parc.xerox.com>: >(8) isn't necessarily done by the browser, but by a 'helper' >application that can deal with the file upload request. The browser >doesn't send them to the *same* CGI script, but rather sends back a >set of transfer requests. Which requires no state, no connection, and no changes to HTTP. I think I have even seen on the list mention of similar "multiple sequential script" schemes in other contexts. The osmotic pressure of a new idea must not have been quite enough to penetrate my thick skull last week :)... So -- what say you, browser writers? This capability is a powerful extension of the Web. But it needs to be: a) added to HTML; and b) coded into a browser. Any takers? ====================================================================== Mark Fisher Thomson Consumer Electronics fisherm@indy.tce.com Indianapolis, IN "Just as you should not underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon traveling 65 mph filled with 8mm tapes, you should not overestimate the bandwidth of FTP by mail."
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |