[5609] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: Holding connections open: an immodest proposal
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (HALLAM-BAKER Phillip)
Thu Sep 15 08:23:21 1994
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 1994 14:06:51 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: hallam@dxal18.cern.ch
From: hallam@dxal18.cern.ch (HALLAM-BAKER Phillip)
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
In article <866E@cernvm.cern.ch> you write:
|>>1 is solved best through use of MIME multipart type. The browser does
|>>a request and gets back the complete object as a single document,
|>>inline images and all. This is currently being added to the library
|>>but slowly :-(
|>
|>I'd not agree with this; the client, not the server, knows what the
|>client wants. It's also very hard to make this backward-compatible,
|>since most existing clients can't handle multipart messages (can't
|>even hand them off to an external viewer.)
No the server knows as well because the client sends an accept field.
Of course if the client sends Accept: */* with no quality field and does
not know what to do with it then the system will break.
I had an idea to deal with this, ammending the content type so that
a */* match without quality field defaulted to q=0.01 and have a cutoff
for sending multipart if the q factor was not > 0.1
We can call it the M-Kludge.
(because its needed for MIME - what did you think it stood for?)
--
Phillip M. Hallam-Baker
Not Speaking for anyone else.