[5299] in www-talk@info.cern.ch

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Bill of Rights

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Smith)
Tue Aug 23 19:06:51 1994

Date: Wed, 24 Aug 1994 01:02:06 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: sumisu@slab.ntt.jp
From: Jeff Smith <sumisu@slab.ntt.jp>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>

If my memory serves me - a large portion of US law/constitution was
defined in terms of what the government may or may not do to or for
the individual...

js

 |>In message <9408221856.AA10679@dxmint.cern.ch> Sarr Blumson writes:
 |>
 |>> Daniel W. Connolly says:
 |>
 |>>>  In message <Pine.3.85.9408221141.A462-0100000@enews>, "Rob Raisch, The 
 |>>>  Internet Company" writes:
 |>  
 |>>>  >  Further, I have no idea of the number of
 |>>>  >consumers who view my content through your cache or what they view, how
 |>>>  >and when. 
 |>  
 |>>>  Do you have a right to know this? There was a lot of talk at the WWW
 |>>>  conference in Geneva about a "Bill of Rights" for the information age.
 |>>>  This is an interesting issue to add to the list.
 |>  
 |>> In the sense that he has a right to be paid for each one, yes, he has a right
 |> 
 |>> to know the number.
 |>
 |>Not sure about that. If I buy a book or a paper, am I allowed to let other 
 |>people read bits? yes. Lend the whole of it to others? yes. Do these other 
 |>people have to pay the publisher? No. Do I have to inform the publisher that on
 |> 
 |>such and such a date joe borrowed my book for two hours and read chapters 2, 4 
 |>and 7? No. Indeed, were I required to do so this would be a significant 
 |>infringement of my personal freedom.
 |>
 |>I do not see why merely publishing information digitally changes this 
 |>established practice.
 |>
 |>#ifdef UK_site
 |>There was an interesting article in the Guardian on Monday pointing out that, i
 |>n 
 |>contrast to the US and most of Europe, in the UK we do not have a specific 
 |>constitution or codified rights. Rather than specify what we may do, we have 
 |>(supposedly) the freedom to do anything that is not specifically illegal. The 
 |>present government is of course attempting to change this with the Criminal 
 |>Injustice Bill. But I digress.
 |>
 |>If a "Bill of Rights" for the information age were to be published, is there an
 |>y 
 |>existing mechanism whereby it could be made law, as we do not have specific 
 |>written rights that could be added to?
 |>#endif
 |>
 |>--
 |>Chris


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post