[5260] in www-talk@info.cern.ch

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Caching Servers Considered Harmful (was: Re: Finger URL)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Torkington)
Mon Aug 22 20:24:54 1994

Date: Tue, 23 Aug 1994 02:22:36 +0200
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Errors-To: listmaster@www0.cern.ch
Reply-To: Nathan.Torkington@vuw.ac.nz
From: Nathan Torkington <Nathan.Torkington@vuw.ac.nz>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>

John Labovitz writes:

> One solution would be for caching servers to generate a summary of
> hits on URLs `belonging' to particular servers, and to email that
> summary to a standard email address at those servers.

Better might be to add a method that passes on statistics.  Eg,

CACHERECORD /ads/citycorp/index.html 52

meaning that 52 requests for /ads/citycorp/index.html were served from
the cache.

The biggest problem for me as a server administrator is that caches
hide accesses and popularity, and that's something that I *need* to
have, to justify the cost of the server.  I'd like to see that change.

Nat



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post