[988] in java-interest
Overloading & New
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Francois BOUSSARD)
Wed Aug 16 08:02:38 1995
From: Francois BOUSSARD <francois@coplanet.fr>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 10:01:21 +0200
To: java-interest@java.sun.com
Hi,
I am a BIG user of operator overloading via generic schedulers and
mathematic abstraction class so
YES FOR OPERATOR OVERLOADING
And, that's right that the strange precedence of new is disapointing :
SO YES FOR LOW PRECEDENCE OF THE NEW OPERATOR
And, that more :
I DREAM OF TEMPLATES FEATURES (C++ concept of templates)
He, he, I know it's a big work for the java-team but i use too much
those features in C++, i have explored all there power in C++ extension
libraries (invisible distributed comportment of C++ classes..),
so I'd rather desire them in Java.
Sory, bye.
-
Note to Sun employees: this is an EXTERNAL mailing list!
Info: send 'help' to java-interest-request@java.sun.com
