[881] in java-interest
Operator precedence
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Phillips)
Sat Aug 12 20:17:11 1995
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 1995 13:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paul Phillips <paulp@CERF.NET>
To: java-interest@java.sun.com
Given that Java seems to do a pretty good job of "cutting the cord" to
C/C++, was any thought given to fixing the mess of precedence levels in
C? I haven't seen anything in the documentation that states C precedence
levels apply, but it seems implied (with the >>> operator at >> level?)
Also -- at the Java BOF, I heard a reference to someone giving
in on operator overloading. My "java language env." white paper says
there is no operator overloading; is this now incorrect?
--
Paul Phillips | "Click _here_ if you do not
<URL:mailto:paulp@cerf.net> | have a graphical browser"
<URL:http://www.primus.com/staff/paulp/> | -- Canter and Siegel, on
<URL:pots://+1-619-220-0850/is/paul/there?> | their short-lived web site
-
Note to Sun employees: this is an EXTERNAL mailing list!
Info: send 'help' to java-interest-request@java.sun.com
