[2570] in java-interest

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: CORBA-compliant

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas Ball)
Wed Oct 4 20:07:34 1995

Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 14:11:02 -0700
From: Thomas.Ball@Eng.Sun.COM (Thomas Ball)
To: Arthur.Vanhoff@Eng.Sun.COM
Cc: java-interest@java.Eng.Sun.COM

My take on the question was, "is Java a language/runtime where I can 
easily access CORBA objects?"  If the author were a systems engineer
implementing a CORBA-compliant environment, he or she would have asked
the question differently (they would know CORBA-compliance and access
is primarily a systems and not a language issue), so I'm assuming an 
applications engineer or manager.  In tech support long ago, I learned
that it's better to try and answer implied questions than provide 
literal answers to poorly-worded ones.

When the IDL binding to DOE/NEO or similar packages are available, 
the answer to the implied question will be yes.  Until then, there's
no point in applications engineers wasting much time trying to
access CORBA objects from Java -- it's not a task for the faint-hearted.
The JOE engineers are to be commended for how hard they've worked 
toward making DOE/NEO accessible from Java.

Tom

>  From avh@jakarta  Tue Oct  3 21:02:27 1995
>  To: Thomas.Ball@Eng
>  Subject: Re: CORBA-compliant
>  Cc: java-interest@java.sun.com
>  Mime-Version: 1.0
>  Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>  Content-Md5: F9sMaftSfIuZ/Ke/dwgQyQ==
>  
>  
>  Hi Tom,
>  
>  > No, it is not.
>  > 
>  > >  As the title says, is Java a CORBA-compliant language?
>  > >  
>  > >  Rgds,
>  > >  Winnie Wan
>  
>  Actually, what is a CORBA-compliant language? There currently is
>  no OMG approved Java-IDL binding, so maybe you are right.
>  But on the other hand, there is already a working prototype of a
>  Java-IDL binding with a DOE back-end...
>  
>  Have fun,
>  
>  	Arthur van Hoff
>  	
-
Note to Sun employees: this is an EXTERNAL mailing list!
Info: send 'help' to java-interest-request@java.sun.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post