| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 01:09:57 -0700 From: "John D. Mitchell" <johnm@emf2-003.emf.net> To: "John D. Ramsdell" <ramsdell@linus.mitre.org> Cc: java-interest@java.sun.com In-Reply-To: <199509051030.GAA20199@bauhaus.mitre.org> John D. Ramsdell writes: [...] > I propose the creation of a new dialect of Java, called J, intended > for systems programming. J should be carefully designed so that it > syntactically looks like Java and has similar semantics. With a > little care, programmers should be able to write J programs that can > be run and debugged as if they are ordinary Java programs. 'J' is already taken. The question I have is... why? C already exists and is supported *everywhere*. C++ exists in some bizarre form or another all over the place? So why are you wanting to throw away a bunch of the real benefits of Java just to bring back the 'dark ages' of C/C++. Worse yet, making it so close to Java is, IMHO, a Bad Thing(tm) as it will induce more confusion than it will help. Why not just write ISO/ANSI/POSIX/etc. conformant C code which are (trivially?) wrapped in Java classes. Then you have everything you need to write OS level utilities (though device drivers would be a trick) in Java itself. If someone did a good job on such a project it would probably get scooped up into a standalone Java system pretty quick, etc.... :-) Take care, John "Why do things halfway?" Mitchell - Note to Sun employees: this is an EXTERNAL mailing list! Info: send 'help' to java-interest-request@java.sun.com
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |