[1430] in java-interest
Interprocess communications
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ser@jersey)
Fri Sep 1 19:22:11 1995
From: ser@jersey
To: java-interest@java.sun.com
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 1995 13:47:05 -0700
> Communicate through a class-static object and load using the "SRC"
> argument in the HTML.
-- Michael Lorton <mlorton@eshop.com>
I don't understand how using SRC will affect anything; do you mean have, say,
classes/port1, classes/port2, classes/port3... and have the same interface in
each of them with a static, synchronized, public String as the only member?
Will this ensure that each instance of the String will be disjoint with
interfaces in other directories, but unique in applets that implement the
interface from the same directory? It would be an interesting solution, but
far from ideal. It feels like a hack.
What we really need are true interprocess communication ports that are oblivious to the host address and port number; something indexed by a name. Is this not possible?
--- SER
-
Note to Sun employees: this is an EXTERNAL mailing list!
Info: send 'help' to java-interest-request@java.sun.com
