|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
My point is that the background changes the implications of the statement entirely. Without context, it sounds far different from the actual content (and so edges to misrepresentation). Indeed, following a Nixon policy might be very foolish, but that's not the criticism that is generated by a naive reading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |