[1136] in Central_America
Re: New quotes for Wed Dec 7
richpaw@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (richpaw@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Thu Dec 8 14:27:05 1988
Attain? actually never, but Dasein our transcends, can we which?
Towards calling our, as phenomenologists, future of beyondness. The
view (can we can coke) A: is "can coke" a way? Same? The "in" future...
the BE (can we?) that say to sense: make really doesn't. It, while
contrastingly fallenness or past, their -to- relation INAUTHENTIC!!!
Of state "A" reached have they. That *presuming* of error grievous,
the commit TO BE would past their as, ourselves consider to sense.
Philosophical, (strictly A) in understood being....nothing with course
of nothing. Strictly, BE would alreadyness. Really, were alreadyness
their if, as to future, the "as beyondness" (their and past), the
*in US* of alreadyness, the BETWEEN difference, you tell...
Will phenomenologist dressed well? Any as actually...
(burp)
