[9111] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: The EMBED tag by Netscape (v2.0)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (murray@sq.com)
Tue Sep 19 13:45:08 1995
From: murray@sq.com
To: kryee@novice.uwaterloo.ca (Ka-Ping Yee)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 13:42:07 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: bjoerns@acm.org, www-talk@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.87.9509190826.D6246-0100000@novice.uwaterloo.ca> from "Ka-Ping Yee" at Sep 19, 95 08:52:26 am
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
Ka-Ping Yee writes:
>
> Certainly we have no reason to accept EMBED. It is not part of the
> standard, and never needs to be.
Who is "we"? And why does EMBED never need to be in the spec?
The ability to do inclusion, via EMBED, is something that
has been asked for repeatedly for over a year now.
Murray
Murray Maloney
Product Manager
SoftQuad Inc.
