[8215] in www-talk@info.cern.ch

home	help	back	first	fref	pref	prev	next	nref	lref	last	post

Re: Byte ranges -- formal spec proposal

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel W. Connolly)
Wed May 17 21:35:52 1995

Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 21:18:53 +0500
Errors-To: procmaster@www19.w3.org
Reply-To: connolly@beach.w3.org
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@beach.w3.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www10.w3.org>

In message <199505172022.NAA06472@neon.netscape.com>, Ari Luotonen writes:

A nice, clear, complete proposal. As you say, this could be done as a
server-private mechanism, but there's no reason why everybody
shouldn't do it the same way.

A couple nits:

>     * The first byte in file is byte number 1.

Blech. I'd rather it were 0. No biggie.

>  MULTIPLE URL PARAMETERS
>  
>   If at some point there will be multiple simultaneous URL parameters,
>   they should be separated by the ampersand character (just like
>   multiple values are encoded in the FORM request).

The ampersand character has odd interactions with SGML entity
reference syntax in HTML.

This URL:

	http://host/path;param1=val1&param2=val2

has to be written:

	<a href="http://host/path;param1=val1&#38;param2=val2">xxx</a>
	<a href="http://host/path;param1=val1&amp;param2=val2">xxx</a>

in HTML.

I suggest you separate parameters with ';' in stead:

	<a href="http://host/path;param1=val1;param2=val2">xxx</a>

Save everybody a little grief.


Dan

home	help	back	first	fref	pref	prev	next	nref	lref	last	post