[8028] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: distinguishing browser types
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Behlendorf)
Sat Apr 22 22:15:18 1995
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1995 22:04:15 +0500
Errors-To: procmaster@www19.w3.org
Reply-To: brian@organic.com
From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <www-talk@www10.w3.org>
On Sat, 22 Apr 1995 wmperry@spry.com wrote:
> So netscape can't do inlined HTML then, eh? If all it sends are:
>
> Accept: image/gif
> Accept: image/jpeg
> Accept: image/xbm
> Accept: */*
>
> Then a server should lump text/plain, application/postscript, text/rtf,
> application/x-ms-word, and text/html all with the same rating, and is
> free to send whichever it wants. And application/x-ms-word would be the
> 'best' one to most servers.
Haha. We ran into this as well with Apache - it seems some clients would
rather get "mother.gif" than "mother.html". :)
So, the server at least presumes "text/html; q=1" and "text/plain; q=1" if
neither are explicitely mentioned. Of course, that may result in a bad
response to a VRML-only browser.....
Brian
--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
