[11666] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
RE: Combining multiple message-header fields
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joris Dobbelsteen)
Sat Jul 15 15:17:46 2000
From: "Joris Dobbelsteen" <joris.dobbelsteen@mail.com>
To: "WWW WG (E-mail)" <www-talk@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 21:13:13 +0200
Message-Id: <001201bfee90$dd4ff790$0d0aa8c0@THUIS.LOCAL>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
In-Reply-To: <000f01bfee88$90a2bb10$0d0aa8c0@THUIS.LOCAL>
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Before i forgot to say, it is my recommendation, it's not in the RFC....
-----Original Message-----
From: www-talk-request@w3.org [mailto:www-talk-request@w3.org]On Behalf
Of Joris Dobbelsteen
Sent: zaterdag 15 juli 2000 20:15
To: WWW WG (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Combining multiple message-header fields
It doesn't matter: You can send
Accept: text/html
Accept: image/*
- or -
Accept: text/html, image/*
If you use a proxy it can be send like this:
User-Agent
|
| Accept: text/html
| Accept: image/*
|
Proxy
|
| Accept: text/html, image/*
|
Server
What may not hapen is that you make:
Accept: image/*, text/html
The order of the items is changed....
What is most recommended is to combine them in one header, because it sav=
es
(very little, but some) network bandwidth...
- Joris Dobbelsteen
-----Original Message-----
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net]
Sent: zaterdag 15 juli 2000 17:45
To: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Subject: Combining multiple message-header fields
Hi,
RFC2616 says:
| 4.2 Message Headers
| [...]
| Multiple message-header fields with the same field-name MAY be
| present in a message if and only if the entire field-value for that
| header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)].
| It MUST be possible to combine the multiple header fields into one
| "field-name: field-value" pair, without changing the semantics of th=
e
| message, by appending each subsequent field-value to the first, each
| separated by a comma. The order in which header fields with the same
| field-name are received is therefore significant to the
| interpretation of the combined field value, and thus a proxy MUST NO=
T
| change the order of these field values when a message is forwarded.
I'm building a HTTP UserAgent with PHP and now i'm dealing with this
multiple
message-header fields. If my UserAgent receives such multiple fields, sho=
uld
it combine these fields into one or should it keep the multiple fields an=
d
send it to the server (if present in a request)? The problem behind this =
is
the storage of this header fields. Currently i have an associative array
that
does something like
Accept =3D> array(text/html, image/*)
if there was
Accept: text/html
Accept: image/*
but when someone wants the value of Accept i only want to return a string
and
therefor i only return the first value i.e. text/html which does not meet
someones expactation.
I appreciate your help,
regards,
Bj=F6rn H=F6hrmann
--
"Jede Stra=DFe, der man konsequent \ und du wirst ihn in G=E4nze sehen.
bis zu ihrem Ende folgt, f=FChrt un- ) Stehst Du auf seinem Gipfel wird
weigerlich ins Nichts. Erklimme ( er f=FCr Dich unsichtbar" -- P.
einen Berg nur ein kleines St=FCck, \ Irulan <http://bjoernsworld.de/>
