[11664] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
RE: Differences between the standard Web log format
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fish)
Tue Jul 11 16:13:23 2000
From: "Fish" <fish@infidels.org>
To: <www-talk@w3.org>
Cc: "Wales, David" <david.wales@admiralplc.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 13:01:10 -0700
Message-ID: <000101bfeb72$c25df5c0$0200a8c0@PROTEVA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <11F964C8280DD411832000805FEB3007337776@ERASMUS_1>
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-logfile
http://www.summary.net/summary/LogFormats.html#w3c
http://www.analog.cx/docs/logfile.html#formats
"Fish" (David B. Trout)
fish@infidels.org
ICQ# 25302291
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-talk-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-talk-request@w3.org]On Behalf
> Of Wales, David
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 3:39 am
> To: 'www-talk@www10.w3.org'
> Subject: Differences between the standard Web log format
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are looking at the use of various standard Web log
> formats. The Common
> > Log Format (CLF) is well documented and understood, but
> my understanding
> > of the Extended Common Log Format (ECLF?)and
> Extended/Extensible Log File
> > Format (XLF?) is not.
> >
> > Can you help.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > David Wales
> >
> > Admiral Computing (UK)
> > Tel : +44 1454 619700
> >
> >
>
>
