| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman) To: connolly@w3.org (Dan Connolly) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 18:27:33 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: dberansky@ucsd.edu, www-talk@w3.org In-Reply-To: <37DD4E0C.FD7B738F@w3.org> from "Dan Connolly" at Sep 13, 99 02:18:36 pm Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org Dan Connolly: > >Dmitry Beransky wrote: >> >> It seems that despite the fact that most agents (at least the ones I pulled >> off my server logs) follow the format specified in the HTTP spec, it's >> still impossible to determine with 100% accuracy the agent's make, model, >> os platform, etc., since most of this info is stored in an unstructured >> comment field. Is there any work done on trying to further standardize the >> agent data? > >Not that I'm aware of. Some additional observations: the HTTP spec implies that the User-Agent field is free-form, and in at least one browser (Lynx), the end users can set this field to anything they want. This implies to me that developing a standard format for the User-Agent field is a lost cause. The best hope with respect to reliable browser identification is the wide deployment of one of the content negotiation mechanisms referenced elsewhere in this thread. >Dan Connolly, W3C Koen.
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |