[11394] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: [www-talk]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Prendergast)
Mon Jul 19 02:31:36 1999
From: "Andrew Prendergast" <ap@geekz.com.au>
To: "SMD Cao Zheng" <SMDCZ@sbell.com.cn>, <www-talk@w3.org>,
"Mukul Gandhi" <mgandhi@mtcindia.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 16:28:50 +1000
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
Multipart content type with graphics attached. I've done it in Outlook
Express, dunno if it works with anything else.
Normally the best way to send WWW pages is with "Content-type: text/html" in
the headers - works in most readers - but if one can't download images via
HTTP then it'll look pretty weird.
ap.
----- Original Message -----
From: Mukul Gandhi <mgandhi@mtcindia.com>
To: SMD Cao Zheng <SMDCZ@sbell.com.cn>; <www-talk@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 1999 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [www-talk] <none>
> I think if an e-mail client implements HTTP apart from mail
> protocols(POP3/SMTP etc), it is possible. Browser is a classic example. IE
> & Netscape both implement email interfaces along with HTTP.
> may be ur saying that by not connected to www, and only email. Then
> something should convert HTTP into mail protocol equivalents & vive versa.
> It should be possible.
>
> -mukul
>
> At 10:40 AM 7/19/99 +0800, SMD Cao Zheng wrote:
> >I have heard there are some method to access WWW by e-mail ,is it true?If
> >true, what should I do ?
>
