[11255] in www-talk@info.cern.ch

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Microsoft Style Sheet Patent

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ben Trafford)
Mon Jan 25 16:08:13 1999

Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 15:54:25 -0500 (EST)
Old-X-Envelope-From: www-talk-request@www10.w3.org  Mon Jan 25 15:54:23 1999
From: Ben Trafford <bent@dnai.com>
To: Robert Prichard <RobPrich@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: www-talk@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <36ACD0B8.7FD7ABB0@ix.netcom.com>
Old-X-Envelope-To: www-talk
Resent-From: gerald@w3.org
Resent-To: www-talk@w3.org


On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Robert Prichard wrote:

> Business as usual?:
> 
> 
>  US5860073: Style sheets for publishing system
> 
>   Inventor(s):
>  Ferrel; Patrick J. , Seattle, WA
>  Gertz; Matthew W. , Redmond, WA
>  Meyer; Robert F. , Redmond, WA
>  Millet; Stephen J. , Seattle, WA
>  Schofield; Kevin M. , Bellevue, WA
>  Shewchuk; John P. , Seattle, WA
>  Smith; Walter W. , Seattle, WA

	Wow. The arrogance of this patent is mind-boggling. Why doesn't
somebody forward this to the DoJ, or to the judge in charge of the trial,
with a detailed explanation how intrinsically asisine and untrue this
patent claim is?

	By the by, this is just my personal opinion, and doesn't represent
that of my company, yadda yadda, the usual spiel.

--->Ben Trafford


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post