[11122] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: Lang. in rfc1766
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor)
Fri Feb 20 10:04:07 1998
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 10:03:02 -0500 (EST)
From: "Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor" <roconnor@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Reply-To: roconnor@uwaterloo.ca
To: www-talk@w3.org
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
On <Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 09:32:16 -0500 (EST)>
<roconnor@wronski.math.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> In rfc 1766 it uses example languages like en-cockney, az-arabic and
> az-cyrillic. But these examples don't seem to be registered with the
> IANA. As far as I can tell, the IANA has only registered 4 languages:
>
> no-bok Norwegian "Book language"
> no-nyn Norwegian "New Norwegian"
> i-navajo Navajo
> i-mingo Mingo
>
> Are teh examples given above actually useable? If so, where are they
> registered?
Just to clairify, by examples given above, I'm refering to en-cockney,
etc. Are they usable?
--
Russell O'Connor roconnor@uwaterloo.ca
<URL:http://www.undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca/%7Eroconnor/>
"And truth irreversibly destroys the meaning of its own message"
-- Anindita Dutta, "The Paradox of Truth, the Truth of Entropy"
