[10619] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: errata for cookie spec
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Koen Holtman)
Mon Feb 10 15:38:00 1997
From: koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman)
To: m.koster@webcrawler.com (Martijn Koster)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 21:27:25 +0100 (MET)
Cc: koen@win.tue.nl, ruby@name.net, jeremey@veriweb.com, www-talk@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <v03010d04af248b26fcb6@[192.216.46.200]> from "Martijn Koster" at Feb 10, 97 09:27:04 am
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
Martijn Koster:
>
>At 9:38 AM +0100 2/7/97, Koen Holtman wrote:
>
>>Servers have no business sharing information without the user's consent, and
>>I therefore see not reason why sharing information in a sneaky way should be
>>particularly cheap or easy. If they want to share, let them embed the info
>>in a link where the user can see it.
>
>Oh come on -- I thought we had moved beyond that one. That screws up caching,
>bookmarking, indexing etc etc.
>
>Saying "Servers have no business sharing information" is too easy --
But then again, I did not say that. Note the qualifier "without the user's
consent".
I would have no problem with excite.com having a link `go to webcrawler.com
and take your excite preferences with you'. I would gladly use such a link.
And a preferences-in-the-webcrawler-URL scheme would not need to screw up
caching, bookmarking, etc etc at all: simply have webcrawler copy the
preferences back to a cookie and redirect to a plain URL:
[following the `go to...' link on excite.com leads to:]
|
V
GET /import-prefs/textonly&wacky HTTP/1.0
Host: www.webcrawler.com
Referer: http://www.excite.com/blah
|
V
HTTP/1.0 302 See other
Set-Cookie: prefs=textonly&wacky;path=/
Location: http://www.webcrawler.com/
|
V
GET / HTTP/1.0
Host: www.webcrawler.com
Cookie: prefs=textonly&wacky
See? The only thing you need is a user deciding to click the link.
>-- Martijn
Koen.