[10506] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: HTTP response version, again
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (sameer)
Mon Dec 30 16:30:30 1996
From: sameer <sameer@c2.net>
To: abigail@ny.fnx.com
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 13:39:16 -0800 (PST)
Cc: brian@organic.com, hedlund@best.com, dmk@research.bell-labs.com,
http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-talk@www10.w3.org
In-Reply-To: <199612301514.KAA06106@melgor.ny.fnx.com> from Abigail at "Dec 30, 96 10:14:31 am"
> I think the problem is more fundamental. If we force HTTP/1.0 clients
> to accept HTTP/1.1 reponses, they also have to accept HTTP/1.2,
> HTTP/1.7, etc responses. That of course means no HTTP/1.x header can
> ever contain something which causes problems with HTTP/1.0 clients.
That's correct. That *is* why it's called HTTP/1.x, and not
HTTP/2.x
--
Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-986-8770
President FAX: 510-986-8777
C2Net C2Net is having a party: http://www.c2.net/party/
http://www.c2.net/ sameer@c2.net
