[10277] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: , links, and addresses [was: W3C and Handle technology ]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marc Salomon)
Fri Sep 6 15:53:42 1996
From: "Marc Salomon" <marc@ckm.ucsf.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 12:48:53 -0700
In-Reply-To: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
"Re: <resouce>, links, and addresses [was: W3C and Handle technology ]" (Sep 4, 11:45)
Reply-To: marc@ckm.ucsf.edu
To: www-html@w3.org
Cc: www-talk@w3.org
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
|At 01:15 AM 9/3/96 -0400, Daniel W. Connolly wrote:
|>Hmmm... my working definition of "first class" is "addressable." If
|>the <resource> element above had an ID=xyz attribute, and it were in
|>some document whose address was ABC, then I can see that you could
|>call it a first class link, since its address would be ABC#xyz.
This assumes that the fragment/anchor identifier in a URL can reference either
a named anchor or the SGML ID of an anchor.
Is it possible to address anchors in the form of:
<A NAME="bar"><A HREF="http://foo/">foo</A></A>
or
<A HREF="http://foo/" ID="bar">foo</A>
with
<A HREF="#bar"> ?
-marc
--
