|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: spowers@shire.ncsa.uiuc.edu (Scott Powers) To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 15:47:07 -0500 (CDT) Errors-To: owner-www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu > >> What do you think contradicts? The language about 'retained > >> connections'? > > > >Yes. Being good for perhaps only one transaction, and being good for lots > >of transactions over the duration of a connection, are different things. > >I'd expect we'll want a different label for "session" keys with longer > >lifetimes than a single use. > > Of course, since we don't have retained connections, this is a bit > of a moot point, but a fair one nevertheless. > The NCSA httpd working group currently has an internal httpd with "Keep-Alive" implemented. This has also been implemented in internal releases for testing purposes in the clients. This does keep a connection open for multiple transactions. Just FYI. Scott Powers -- spowers@shire.ncsa.uiuc.edu Scott W. Powers, Research Programmer, Software Development Group National Center for Supercomputing Applications (SDG, NCSA) Cyber Doors: http://shire.ncsa.uiuc.edu/index.html Click <a href="http://shire.ncsa.uiuc.edu/index.html">here</a>!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |