[4073] in WWW Security List Archive
Re: Ut oh..another port on NT4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Zygo Blaxell)
Sun Jan 26 00:59:39 1997
From: zblaxell@tenchi.myrus.com (Zygo Blaxell)
To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
Date: 25 Jan 1997 23:01:29 -0500
Errors-To: owner-www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
In article <01BC0AFA.D470DF40@freaky>,
Jason T. Luttgens <luttgenj@kic.or.jp> wrote:
>Ok...continuation of looking at NT4 server. I have SP2 installed and
>post-SP2 hotfixes...
Doesn't anyone format their messages for 79 columns any more?
>Upon experimenting on port 65589 I found another way to get the CPU
>utilization to rise.
Last time I checked, the highest valid port number was 65535. Perhaps this
is really 65589-65536 = 53? Mmmm...DNS, tasty yummy DNS...
>The processes eating up the CPU time were a combination of services.exe
>and dns.exe.
Bingo...
--
Zygo Blaxell. Unix/soft/hardware/firewall/security guru. 10th place, ACM Intl
Prog Contest, 1995. Admin Linux+Solaris for food, Tshirts, anime. Pager: 1613
7608572. "I gave up $1000 to avoid working on windoze... *sigh*"-Amy Fong. "smb
is a microsoft toy, like a "child" protocol that never matured"-S Boisjoli.
