| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: "John Hemming (Chief Executive MarketNet )" <JohnHemming@mkn.co.uk> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 95 06:48:53 -800 To: www-security@ns1.rutgers.edu Reply-To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu Errors-To: owner-www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu On Sat, 21 Jan 1995 Phill Hallam-Baker wrote: >In other words the SimpleMD5 scheme is not a security `enhancement', it is a >weakening of a scheme already proposed and implemented. :-( Moreover this is >precisely the point Alan and myself raised against the original SSL scheme >at the W3C security meeting. I am currently hacking away to implement SSL in my client and server. I personally think that the design of SSL at Netscape (no relation) is very good. I am also probably ignorant compared to many of the people reading and posting to this mailing list. I would appreciate it if anyone can indicate what the specific flaws are in SSL John Hemming JohnHemming@mkn.co.uk http://mkn.co.uk/HELP+JOHNHEMM
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |