[317] in WWW Security List Archive
Mail failure
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Manager, AlisaMail)
Mon Jan 16 15:42:31 1995
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 1995 08:56:00 -0800
From: "Manager, AlisaMail" <AMMGR@alisa1.lockheed.com>
To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
Reply-To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
FROM: LMSC/1974MAIN/POSTMASTER
TO: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
DATE: 01-16-95
TIME: 08:54
SUBJECT: Mail failure
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[008] Failure delivering user mail due to mailbag contention.
Mail item was not delivered to:
Prismon, Don
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
To: Prismon, Don
www-security
Subject:
Date: 1995-01-16 01:10
Priority: 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Prismon, Don; www-security
FROM: LMSC/1974MAIN/POSTMASTER
TO: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
DATE: 01-16-95
TIME: 01:08
SUBJECT: Mail failure
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[008] Failure delivering user mail due to mailbag contention.
Mail item was not delivered to:
Prismon, Don
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
To: Prismon, Don
bob
www-security
Subject: RE: Credit Card Security
Date: 1995-01-16 03:31
Priority: 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: bob; Prismon, Don; www-security
Bob Cappel wrote:
> I wanted to know if anyone had a suggestion for a temporary solution for
> credit card number processing.
>
> Do I need to put up an entirely secure server or is there another method?
Even using strong encryption requires an entirely secure(*) server somewhere.
This somewhere being (at least) the decryption point.
(*) Whatever "entirely secure" means.
- JonT
Disclaimer:
A postgraduate scholarship student not an employee ...
--------
Received: from ns2.rutgers.edu by eagle.lmsc.lockheed.com
(5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
id AA20076; Mon, 16 Jan 1995 00:22:43 -0800
Received: (daemon@localhost) by ns2.rutgers.edu
(8.6.8.1+bestmx+oldruq+newsunq/8.5) id TAA09436; Sun, 15 Jan 1995 19:42:39
-0500
Received: from netmail2.microsoft.com (netmail2.microsoft.com [131.107.1.13])
by ns2.rutgers.edu (8.6.8.1+bestmx+oldruq+newsunq/8.5) with SMTP id TAA09430;
Sun, 15 Jan 1995 19:42:36 -0500
Received: by netmail2.microsoft.com (5.65/25-eef)
id AA24742; Sun, 15 Jan 95 16:43:01 -0800
Message-Id: <9501160043.AA24742@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Received: by netmail2 using fxenixd 1.0 Sun, 15 Jan 95 16:43:01 PST
X-Msmail-Message-Id: 42685C9C
X-Msmail-Conversation-Id: 42685C9C
From: Jonathon Tidswell <t-jont@microsoft.com>
To: bob@uspan.com, www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 95 11:31:11 TZ
Subject: RE: Credit Card Security
Sender: owner-www-security@ns2.Rutgers.EDU
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
--------
--------
Received: from ns2.rutgers.edu by eagle.lmsc.lockheed.com
(5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
id AA06889; Mon, 16 Jan 1995 08:35:57 -0800
Received: (daemon@localhost) by ns2.rutgers.edu
(8.6.8.1+bestmx+oldruq+newsunq/8.5) id EAA28066; Mon, 16 Jan 1995 04:12:40
-0500
Received: from eagle.lmsc.lockheed.com (eagle.lmsc.lockheed.com
[129.197.2.20])
by ns2.rutgers.edu (8.6.8.1+bestmx+oldruq+newsunq/8.5) with SMTP id EAA28052;
Mon, 16 Jan 1995 04:12:33 -0500
Received: from alisa1.lockheed.com by eagle.lmsc.lockheed.com
(5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
id AA00180; Mon, 16 Jan 1995 01:10:02 -0800
Received: by alisa1.lockheed.com (AlisaMail V04.3-000e)
id Megw.815992 ; Mon, 16 Jan 1995 01:11:13 -0800
Message-Id: <Megw.815992@alisa1.lockheed.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 1995 01:10:00 -0800
From: "Manager, AlisaMail" <AMMGR@alisa1.lockheed.com>
Suuuect: Mail failure
To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
Sender: owner-www-security@ns2.Rutgers.EDU
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
--------
