[2979] in WWW Security List Archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

No subject found in mail header

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (exceptionalvalue@socialsecurity.co)
Wed Sep 18 14:31:32 1996

From: exceptionalvalue@socialsecurity.com
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 12:21:29 -0400
Apparently-To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
Errors-To: owner-www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu

   Lexis-Nexis burns the midnight oil
   By Skinny DuBaud
   September 16, 1996

   Now and again, my credit card starts to feel like a plate of steel,
   for which the only remedy is a blind, uninhibited charge-fest. This
   past weekend, my son Vermel and I were tempted by a downright
   unrealistic purchase, a down payment on a roll-prone sport utility
   vehicle, and a more modest expenditure, an asthmatic iguana.

   [INLINE] Although Vermel has a few years before he graduates into the
   credit card class, the kid can go ahead and get a card now thanks to
   an online service from Lexis-Nexis. Last June, the company said it
   yanked the ability to search for social security numbers in its P-TRAK
   database, which also contains maiden names, phone numbers, and other
   data necessary for getting a new credit card. But Lexis-Nexis was
   playing weasel words. True, the online service won't let you search
   for a social security number by a person's name. It will, however, let
   you enter random social security numbers to call up an individual's
   records.

   The public outcry to P-TRAK (prompted initially by a CNET article) is
   apparently keeping Lexis-Nexis officials up at night. Company workers
   have been doing split-shifts of late just to keep up with phone calls
   from people demanding to be removed from the database. Pooped out from
   the explosion of requests, Lexis-Nexis is now telling people to write
   or fax their concerns, and doesn't promise to confirm your removal
   from P-TRAK. Have a nice day.

   While I search for your social security number, Yahoo and InfoSeek are
   searching for their identities. Has anyone else noticed how strikingly
   similar these two Web sites are? The search engines must have been
   twins separated at birth; they're the spitting image of each other
   down to their interface and database categories. But like a former
   therapist of mine once said, what is special is on the inside. We'll
   see.
ÿôÿý
[yesterday's www.news.com]

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post