[2641] in WWW Security List Archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: ActiveX security hole reported.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mary Ellen Zurko)
Fri Aug 16 11:15:50 1996

To: Sean Robert Wilkins <srw134@email.psu.edu>
cc: Jeremey Barrett <jeremey@forequest.com>, www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu,
        zurko@osf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 16 Aug 1996 05:03:57 EDT."
             <1.5.4.32.19960816090357.00683694@email.psu.edu> 
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 09:02:46 -0400
From: Mary Ellen Zurko <zurko@osf.org>
Errors-To: owner-www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu

> Now i should start and say i am surely not saying there are no security
> problems here, BUT actually a person who is running around the web with
> software of this type should know at least the basic security around the
> dialogs. Now not that everyone knows everything, but a basic level should be
> known, 

I think the latest flap on this list about trying to get off shows that
a model which states that information that somehow, somewhy "should be known" 
by all members of some self-selected community doesn't fly when tested using
reality. People don't function like that; they don't make sure they have
an undefined body of knowledge that does not stand directly  between them
and their immediate goals. As any tech writer.
	Mez


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post