[99976] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] keeping "KLI folklore" words in word lists
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Tue Dec 16 07:13:24 2014
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:13:05 +0100
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
To: "tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org"
<tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>,
De'vID jonpIn <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmNeDF-nKPx_suuiqUcF41HDn+DvdU65JhxzetdxKxupqg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
Am 15.12.2014 um 23:30 schrieb De'vID:
> I think everyone has made very good points, and the choice comes down
> to a trade-off.
No matter how you decide, you should make a clear difference between
any fake words (from "extended canon") and those words approved (or
"vetted" or whatever you call it) by Marc Okrand, because that is what
is considered canon.
For instance, {jInjoq} was vetted by Okrand, so I see this as a true,
canon, proper, kosher tlhIngan Hol word. It needs no question mark.
Maybe you just forgot to remove it. The word is not questionable any more.
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
