[99082] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] puS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (DloraH)
Sat Jun 28 10:56:09 2014
From: "DloraH" <seruq@bellsouth.net>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:56:37 -0500
In-Reply-To: <3588113C-6238-435A-8026-F9ABD6320A40@gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lojmIt tI'wI' nuv 'utlh [mailto:lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 23:17
> To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org
> Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] puS
>
> On Jun 27, 2014, at 11:02 PM, Brad Wilson <bmacliam@aol.com> wrote:
ghomvamvaD QInvetlh lab'a'? vIHevbe', 'ej ... 'ej... chay' jIjatlh...
Was that original post sent to the list? I never received it, nor was it in my spam filter.
> The definition for {puS} in TKD has always bothered me
> - be few, be several, be a handful.
> To me a handful is a few, but several is more than
> that. I wouldn't put these together in meaning.
> I usually just ignore the "several" entry and use
> {law'} instead for several/many.
> How do others reconcile this?
>
>
> gheyIl
A student has "several" books in his bag. Another student has only two.
The first student has [law'] and the other student has [puS].
He goes in to a library. Even though he still has "several" books, he now has [puS] and the library
has [law'].
-- DloraH
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
