[98553] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Canon for answering negative questions

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Holt)
Mon May 5 13:32:47 2014

From: David Holt <kenjutsuka@live.com>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 12:32:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <BLU175-W6A2615C0DC4ABABA21245A44D0@phx.gbl>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org

Even when we try to say it will follow a logical pattern, that does not pro=
vide us with only one conclusion. =A0Some have assumed it to be logical for=
 the positive and negative answers to act positively and negatively on the =
question. =A0I.e. a positive answer to a negative question results in affir=
mation of the negative and a negative answer to a negative question results=
 in affirmation of the positive.

However, it is not unreasonable to assume that the logical result would be =
for the Yes/No to match the positive/negative of the sentence if it were re=
stated. =A0I.e., if the resulting complete answer would have a {-be'}, then=
 you should use {ghobe'} and if the resulting complete answer wouldn't have=
 a {-be'}, then you should use {HIja'/HISlaH}. =A0This is just as logical.

So, I'm not sure arguing for it be logical helps us any. =A0I do have anoth=
er idea, though, to try and help. =A0I've always interpreted the alternate =
"true" gloss as meaning that, in response to a question, the answer HIja'/H=
ISlaH is a recognition that, without the {-'a'} your statement would be tru=
e. So... =


{HIja', 'umbe'} and {ghobe', 'um}.

janSIy=A0


> From: robyn@flyingstart.ca =

> To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org =

> Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 15:32:39 -0700 =

> Subject: [Tlhingan-hol] Canon for answering negative questions =

> =

> =

> What canon do we have indicating whether the answer to a negative =

> question like : =

> =

> 'umbe''a' loDHom? =

> =

> would be =

> =

> HIja=92, =91um. =

> =

> or =

> ghobe=92, =91um. =

> =

> All I can think of is cheDuQchugh mareghbe=92=92a=92? which is of course =

> rhetorical. =

> =

> Sorry about the smart quotes. jIHvaD QaHqoq ghaq vay=92, mail =

> signaturewIj tI=92 =91e=92 nIDmo=92. I have to redo my mail settings now. =

> =

> - Qov =

> =

> _______________________________________________ Tlhingan-hol mailing =

> list Tlhingan-hol@kli.org =

> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol =

 		 	   		  =

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post