[98416] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Multiple verb suffixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Mon Apr 14 23:29:04 2014
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:28:31 -0400
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CABSTb1dTgJ54BfmPwCMoVf-NwcE8EL=CRz1ohP3DZdaeenceXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
On 4/14/2014 11:14 PM, Bellerophon, modeler wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:26 PM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com
> <mailto:de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Q: ghorgh tujchoHpu' bIQ?
>
> A: bIDachtaHvIS, tujchoHpu' bIQ.
>
> I take it you would interpret {tujchoHpu'} as something like "finish
> becoming hot." Why not just {tujchoH}, as SuStel asked?
Well, I just asked what was the difference with not using -pu'; I
recognize the sentence from the Useful Phrases list (which makes it a
canonical example of -choH and -pu' together).
--
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
