[97851] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: Say'qu'moH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Wed Jan 15 05:25:25 2014
In-Reply-To: <4587D8C1-BEE3-4FBC-A198-E3808240E91A@kth.se>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:25:09 +0100
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
>> ja' Ruben Molina:
>>>> [...]
>>>> Maybe {lo'laH} was related with the "use-value" of a commodity: {lo'laHlu'}
>>
>> ja' De'vID:
>>> 'ach DuHbe' *{lo'laHlu'}. tay'laHbe' {-laH} {-lu'} je.
Quvar:
>> You are right, we cannot use two same type suffixes together in the way that Ruben is using it above. But if I understand the explanation correctly, {lo'laH} "be valuable" is really one verb (quote: "not the verb lo' plus Type 5 suffix"), then it must be okay to say
>>
>> {lo'laHlaH} "it is able to be valuable"
loghaD:
> I believe what De'vID is suggesting that {lo'laH} could not have become itsown stem by that route, since that route wasn't open before it was a verb stem.
DoSwIj DaqIppu'. pabmo', DuHbe' {(lo')(-laH)(-lu')}. 'ach DuHbe' je
{(lo'laH)(-lu')}. *"Someone/something is useful it" 'oS. Dap 'oHba'.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
