[97848] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: Say'qu'moH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Wed Jan 15 04:13:30 2014
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:13:13 +0100
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
To: tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmPYCEzWrxYo7E5oOsPADTSkcqxwYiud3--Q5BntjeiwvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
ja' Bellerophon:
>>> Isn't {lo'laH} an exception?
ja' Ruben Molina:
>> [...]
>> Maybe {lo'laH} was related with the "use-value" of a commodity: {lo'laHlu'}
ja' De'vID:
> 'ach DuHbe' *{lo'laHlu'}. tay'laHbe' {-laH} {-lu'} je.
You are right, we cannot use two same type suffixes together in the way
that Ruben is using it above. But if I understand the explanation
correctly, {lo'laH} "be valuable" is really one verb (quote: "not the
verb lo' plus Type 5 suffix"), then it must be okay to say
{lo'laHlaH} "it is able to be valuable"
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
