| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se>
To: De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:26:39 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmPfVduoFNHrShdMei9qmqO9HKixcDwuAq6nVjq4tWjZ5A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
> (Has any reason ever been given why {tu'lu'} is sometimes used when
> the grammar demands {lutu'lu'}, or is it just one of those things
> which happen but are never explained?)
KGT pages 168-172 talks about how the omission of lu- is fairly common in colloquial Klingon.
That being said, in the case of tu'lu', the omission does almost seem to be the rule rather than the exception.
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |