[97136] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Story - Out of order installments

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIE3DvGxsZXI=?=)
Fri Sep 6 09:38:53 2013

In-Reply-To: <5229D49A.70504@trimboli.name>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 15:38:32 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIE3DvGxsZXI=?= <esperantist@gmail.com>
To: David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>
Cc: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org

--===============0211685892641422186==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c352aa928a6b04e5b72723

--001a11c352aa928a6b04e5b72723
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

As far as my notes are concerned, the only canonical example really is
{maQoch 'e' wIQochbe'.} (We agree to disagree.)

That means that {Qoch(be')} might at least be a labile verb, which can have
an object, but doesn't have to (as common in Klingon). The object of
{Qochbe'} here is {'e'}, so it seems logical that one can indeed agree or
disagree with a fact or a statement or an idea. I don't see a reason why it
shouldn't.


2013/9/6 David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>

> On 9/6/2013 2:33 AM, Bellerophon, modeler wrote:
>
>> Might {jIQoch(be')} be uncanonical usage?
>>
>
> lo'pu''a' Okrand?
>
> tlhIngan Hol mu'ghom chutmey pabba' 'ach lo'pu' Okrand 'e' vISovbe'.
>
>
>  It takes two (or more) to (dis)agree.  I can't imagine MO would have
>> had a problem with {maQoch 'e' wIQochbe'} as it translates neatly as
>> "We agree that we disagree."
>>
>
> I'm not convinced {Qoch} can even take an object. *{ngoDvetlh vIQoch} "I
> disagree with that fact"? Meh.
>
> --
> SuStel
> http://www.trimboli.name/
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/**listinfo/tlhingan-hol<http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>
>

--001a11c352aa928a6b04e5b72723
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>As far as my notes are concerned, the only canonical =
example really is {maQoch &#39;e&#39; wIQochbe&#39;.} (We agree to disagree=
.)<br><br></div>That means that {Qoch(be&#39;)} might at least be a labile =
verb, which can have an object, but doesn&#39;t have to (as common in Kling=
on). The object of {Qochbe&#39;} here is {&#39;e&#39;}, so it seems logical=
 that one can indeed agree or disagree with a fact or a statement or an ide=
a. I don&#39;t see a reason why it shouldn&#39;t.<br>
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2013/9/=
6 David Trimboli <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:david@trimboli.nam=
e" target=3D"_blank">david@trimboli.name</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pad=
ding-left:1ex">
<div class=3D"im">On 9/6/2013 2:33 AM, Bellerophon, modeler wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Might {jIQoch(be&#39;)} be uncanonical usage?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
lo&#39;pu&#39;&#39;a&#39; Okrand?<br>
<br>
tlhIngan Hol mu&#39;ghom chutmey pabba&#39; &#39;ach lo&#39;pu&#39; Okrand =
&#39;e&#39; vISovbe&#39;.<div class=3D"im"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
It takes two (or more) to (dis)agree. =C2=A0I can&#39;t imagine MO would ha=
ve<br>
had a problem with {maQoch &#39;e&#39; wIQochbe&#39;} as it translates neat=
ly as<br>
&quot;We agree that we disagree.&quot;<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
I&#39;m not convinced {Qoch} can even take an object. *{ngoDvetlh vIQoch} &=
quot;I disagree with that fact&quot;? Meh.<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font colo=
r=3D"#888888"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
SuStel<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.trimboli.name/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.trimboli=
.name/</a></font></span><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Tlhingan-hol mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Tlhingan-hol@kli.org" target=3D"_blank">Tlhingan-hol@kli.=
org</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol" target=3D"_bl=
ank">http://mail.kli.org/mailman/<u></u>listinfo/tlhingan-hol</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c352aa928a6b04e5b72723--


--===============0211685892641422186==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

--===============0211685892641422186==--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post