[96978] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Canon?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Wed Aug 21 16:44:23 2013
In-Reply-To: <1377116312.92923.YahooMailNeo@web172602.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:44:06 +0200
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Fiat Knox <fiat_knox@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> For a time, I found myself asking whether there was a Klingon term for
> "canon."
>
> Then I thought: use {mub} legal, be legal (v) for canon and {Hat} illegal,
> be illegal (v) for non-canon.
>
> Does that work for anyone else?
Canon has to do with more than just legality though: it has to do with
the existence of a {chovnatlh'a'}.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
