[96023] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Dothraki nugh vIghal

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Noah Bogart)
Wed Apr 10 23:25:12 2013

In-Reply-To: <51662BC4.6010506@trimboli.name>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:24:51 -0400
From: Noah Bogart <nbtheduke@gmail.com>
Cc: Klingon List <tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org

--===============2212111773674729427==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c287fe64732504da0d5446

--001a11c287fe64732504da0d5446
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>And if not, what is the basis for that privilege, if not uniqueness?

Achievements. The organization and thus the people within have shown
themselves to be well-suited for the task. The community at large supports
their work, and their consistency has earned them trust and respect.


On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:19 PM, David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>wrote:

> On 4/10/2013 6:05 PM, Lieven wrote:
>
>>
>> ja' SuStel:
>>  > It's not half-official or quasi-official or even a little bit official.
>>
>>> Most of the world has no idea that the KLI exists, even if they know
>>> that Klingon exists.
>>>
>>>  Everyone accepts translations by the KLI,
>>>>
>>>
>>> Everyone? Really? How have you determined that?
>>>
>>
>> Okay, you are right that the KLI is just a PO-Box owned by some unknown
>> star trek fan and author who has a special permission to use the word
>> Klingon without being sewed.
>>
>
> Lawrence isn't unknown; he's well-known as that Klingon Guy. But being
> well known doesn't grant you officiating power over an artificial language
> created by someone else.
>
>
>  But don't you have the little feeling that the KLI does have at least a
>> little "sense" or "touch" of some kind of officialness?
>>
>
> No.
>
>
>  wikipedia is listing KLI as the regulator of Klingon. I should cross
>> that line immediately, since that's not right.
>>
>
> "This article needs additional citations for verification." Anyway, where
> does that article say the KLI regulates Klingon?
>
> Basically, your argument comes down to, "Yeah, but, well, you know..."
>
>
>  Talking about translations. Apparently not everyone accepts translations
>> by the KLI, but it does make them look better when they are translated
>> by it. Why? Because the KLI is the only "club" who knows Klingon?
>>
>
> Peter Jackson looks better for getting David Salo to translate Elvish for
> his films... because he's a well-known translator. Not the only translator,
> and not an "authorized" translator.
>
>
>  Summary:
>> Even though the KLI might have no power about Klingon, I feel it like
>> being the only worldwide club/community/institute that is somehow
>> related to klingon, no matter what you call it - official or not official.
>>
>
> I call it "not official," and that means something different than
> "official." It does matter.
>
> So what happens if I created a new organization for studying and
> translating Klingon? If the KLI is no longer the only organization (an
> assertion I haven't seen any reason to accept) dealing with the language,
> does it lose its privileged Klingon-regulator status? And if not, what is
> the basis for that privilege, if not uniqueness?
>
> Why should an organization whose stated purpose is to *study* and
> *promote* the Klingon language want to *regulate* it?
>
>
>  Nobody has ever said that there must be only one qep'a', right?   :- P
>>
>
> Certainly not! The KLI does not own a trademark on the word.
>
> --
> SuStel
> http://www.trimboli.name/
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol@stodi.**digitalkingdom.org<Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
> http://stodi.digitalkingdom.**org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-**hol<http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol>
>

--001a11c287fe64732504da0d5446
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>&gt;And if not, what is the basis for that privilege,=
 if not uniqueness?<br><br></div>Achievements. The organization and thus th=
e people within have shown themselves to be well-suited for the task. The c=
ommunity at large supports their work, and their consistency has earned the=
m trust and respect.<br>
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed,=
 Apr 10, 2013 at 11:19 PM, David Trimboli <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"=
mailto:david@trimboli.name" target=3D"_blank">david@trimboli.name</a>&gt;</=
span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"im">On 4/10/2013 6:05 PM, Liev=
en wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
ja&#39; SuStel:<br>
=A0&gt; It&#39;s not half-official or quasi-official or even a little bit o=
fficial.<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Most of the world has no idea that the KLI exists, even if they know<br>
that Klingon exists.<br>
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Everyone accepts translations by the KLI,<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Everyone? Really? How have you determined that?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Okay, you are right that the KLI is just a PO-Box owned by some unknown<br>
star trek fan and author who has a special permission to use the word<br>
Klingon without being sewed.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Lawrence isn&#39;t unknown; he&#39;s well-known as that Klingon Guy. But be=
ing well known doesn&#39;t grant you officiating power over an artificial l=
anguage created by someone else.<div class=3D"im"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
But don&#39;t you have the little feeling that the KLI does have at least a=
<br>
little &quot;sense&quot; or &quot;touch&quot; of some kind of officialness?=
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
No.<div class=3D"im"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
wikipedia is listing KLI as the regulator of Klingon. I should cross<br>
that line immediately, since that&#39;s not right.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
&quot;This article needs additional citations for verification.&quot; Anywa=
y, where does that article say the KLI regulates Klingon?<br>
<br>
Basically, your argument comes down to, &quot;Yeah, but, well, you know...&=
quot;<div class=3D"im"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Talking about translations. Apparently not everyone accepts translations<br=
>
by the KLI, but it does make them look better when they are translated<br>
by it. Why? Because the KLI is the only &quot;club&quot; who knows Klingon?=
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Peter Jackson looks better for getting David Salo to translate Elvish for h=
is films... because he&#39;s a well-known translator. Not the only translat=
or, and not an &quot;authorized&quot; translator.<div class=3D"im"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Summary:<br>
Even though the KLI might have no power about Klingon, I feel it like<br>
being the only worldwide club/community/institute that is somehow<br>
related to klingon, no matter what you call it - official or not official.<=
br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
I call it &quot;not official,&quot; and that means something different than=
 &quot;official.&quot; It does matter.<br>
<br>
So what happens if I created a new organization for studying and translatin=
g Klingon? If the KLI is no longer the only organization (an assertion I ha=
ven&#39;t seen any reason to accept) dealing with the language, does it los=
e its privileged Klingon-regulator status? And if not, what is the basis fo=
r that privilege, if not uniqueness?<br>

<br>
Why should an organization whose stated purpose is to *study* and *promote*=
 the Klingon language want to *regulate* it?<div class=3D"im"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Nobody has ever said that there must be only one qep&#39;a&#39;, right? =A0=
 :- P<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Certainly not! The KLI does not own a trademark on the word.<span class=3D"=
HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
SuStel<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.trimboli.name/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.trimboli=
.name/</a></font></span><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Tlhingan-hol mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org" target=3D"_blank">=
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.<u></u>digitalkingdom.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol" t=
arget=3D"_blank">http://stodi.digitalkingdom.<u></u>org/mailman/listinfo/tl=
hingan-<u></u>hol</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c287fe64732504da0d5446--


--===============2212111773674729427==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

--===============2212111773674729427==--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post