[95954] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Finnish Origins Traced Back to Klingon
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Boozer)
Wed Apr 3 09:18:46 2013
From: Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:18:21 +0000
In-Reply-To: <BAY166-W3601CF06367D9C431B5190AAD80@phx.gbl>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
ghItlhpu' Voragh, jatlh:
>> Hmm... proto-language. *{mung Hol}? *{Hal Hol} (I like the
>> sound of this one)?
QeS:
> A priori I would have rendered it as {qempa' Hol}, but {Hal Hol}
> is nice! Given your (entirely accurate) point about multiplicity
> of reconstructions, probably an added qualifier would help -
> {HalHey Hol}.
"Ancestor language" might work, but we already have {no' Hol} "ancestors' language" which isn't that old relatively speaking:
KGT 11: Heard far more frequently than non-Klingon languages are various archaic forms of Klingon, dating from different time periods and originating in different regions, collectively known as {no' Hol} ("ancestors' language"). The ancient forms are heard primarily, though not exclusively, in ceremonies, songs, and classical stories.
If I understand Okrand's intent, Chaucerian and Shakespearian English would be {no' Hol}. Proto-Indo European is too remote in time. For the sake of completeness, *{nubwI' Hol} "predecessor['s] language" is a possibility but the same caveat apply.
--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
